The management of poor performance in nursing and midwifery: a case for concern.

Aim(s) - To examine the evidence of how poorly performing nurses and midwives are managed in the UK NHS Background – There is little evidence about poor performance and its management in nursing and midwifery literature. Method(s) – The scoping study comprised a literature search, analysis of recent Nursing and Midwifery Council data and a day’s observation at NMC fitness to practice hearings. Results – Nurses and midwives are the clinical groups most likely to be suspended from work in the NHS; NHS Trusts do not report data on suspensions therefore no statistics exist on numbers, reasons for suspensions, managerial processes, gender, area of work, or ethnicity of those suspended; the few major research projects identify variable management practices regarding poor performance, the significant financial cost to the NHS and the personal cost to those suspended; there is some evidence that inexperienced, poorly trained, or poorly supported managers use suspension inappropriately. Our day of observation supported this. Conclusion(s) – There is a need for more robust data gathering and research in the field of NHS managerial practice. Implications for Nursing Management – Managers should refrain from adopting punitive forms of performance management. Both frontline staff and management need better training and support for dealing with poor performance

Disciplinary processes and the management of poor performance among UK nurses: bad apple or systemic failure? A scoping study

The rise of managerialism within healthcare systems has been noted globally. This paper uses the findings of a scoping study to investigate the management of poor performance among nurses and midwives in the United Kingdom within this context. The management of poor performance among clinicians in the NHS has been seen as a significant policy problem. There has been a profound shift in the distribution of power between professional and managerial groups in many health systems globally. We examined literature published between 2000 and 10 to explore aspects of poor performance and its management. We used Web of Science, CINAHL, MEDLINE, British Nursing Index, HMIC, Cochrane Library and PubMed. Empirical data are limited but indicate that nurses and midwives are the clinical groups most likely to be suspended and that poor performance is often represented as an individual deficit. A focus on the individual as a source of trouble can serve as a distraction from more complex systematic problems

Impact case studies submitted to REF2014: the hidden impact of nursing research

The UK’s Research Excellence Framework (REF) 2014 rated the research from 154 universities and the impact of research was evaluated in 6975 impact case studies. Nursing was returned within unit of Assessment (UoA) 3 which also included Dentistry, Pharmacy, Allied Health Professions, although nursing research was also submitted within other UoAs. The study aim was to collate and categorise available REF impact case studies involving nursing researchers or on topics of relevance to nursing. Using nurs* as a search term 469 case study entries were retrieved from the REF database and placed into three categories determined by the level of involvement of nurses. Some 80 impact case studies were submitted by nurses across 11 UoAs: the majority being in UoA3 (n=55). A further 50 revealed some relevant impact, though nurses did not have an obvious research role. A total of 248 case studies described actual or potential impact on health or social care but were not associated specifically with nursing. Nursing research has demonstrable impact, however there is a significant body of research with relevance for nursing that has not been associated with the profession in the REF. More attention should be paid to the ‘hidden impact’ of nursing research to ensure the full impact of nursing is recognised